A source of free nitrogen for sustainable soils?

28May2010

Did you know it takes 2.5 times more energy to produce a tonne of ammonium nitrate fertiliser than the energy contained within it? No wonder it has become so inflationary.
 
As more farmers are measuring the carbon footprint of their businesses, more and more are realising that often over 50% of the farm’s footprint comes from the use of manufactured fertiliser. An essential part of managing nitrogen for increased yield and crop quality, while lessening the impact on the environment and reducing costs, is to ensure that a large part of your nitrogen requirements are sourced from the atmosphere rather than a bag.
 
The most productive soils on the planet have produced massive amounts of biomass for thousands of years and most of their nitrogen was sourced from the atmosphere. 74,000 tonnes of atmospheric nitrogen hovers over every hectare so why do we seem so slow to grasp technology to harness and utilise it?
 
Could the answer be in the mode of nitrogen fixing microbes, which supply nitrogen as and when it is required by the plant? It is in this form that nitrogen is most closely linked to plant health, crop quality, disease protection, flavour and shelf-life. I think it is no accident that the most abundant gas in the atmosphere is also the most abundant nutrient required for plant growth…

This must be the free gift that we somehow forgot to open, but how do we now access it?
 
The key to accessing atmospheric nitrogen involves making the most of soil biology and working with the rules of natural systems rather than against them. So, minerals such as cobalt, iron and soluble phosphate need to be available, the right ratio between calcium and magnesium levels need to be struck and sufficient soil carbon needs to be available to provide sanctuary to nitrogen fixing bacteria.
 
Rebuilding these essential components of soil biological systems is essential to supporting sustainable yields in the long term that are less dependent on manufactured inputs. A useful way to think about how to improve the biology of your soils is to think about getting your crops to behave like legumes, which may seem a little strange to some people. However, we are all comfortable with the fact that legumes, or rather the microbes within the root nodules, are able to fix atmospheric nitrogen – so why can’t all plants work harder at doing this job more effectively?

While getting the soil biology right is an essential start, ensuring the establishment of ‘Colony Forming Units’ or nitrogen fixing bacteria onto the leaf or root surface is also essential. We've developed a product called ‘Twin N’, and our evidence so far shows that it could enable agricultural crops to fix their own nitrogen. This could help to reduce the grower’s carbon footprint while greatly economising on bought-in fertilisers.

Mike is the Managing Director of Bodle Bros. Ltd. Click here to find out more.

What do you think of Mike’s ideas? Add your comments below...

 

Twin N - false word

Fri, 23/07/2010 - 15:26
By Agrarservice Heine (not verified)

Hi,

I had a false word . Winter haper means winter oat

Sorry !

Agrarservice Heine

Twin N

Fri, 23/07/2010 - 11:36
By Agrarservice Heine (not verified)

Hi,
we distribute Twinn since 2008 in Germany. It functions. I can confirm this. It is important which is supplied the ground substantially with the other nutrients. A biologically active ground affects very positively the Twin N bacteria. Thus we have, for example, in Switzerland this year with winter haper 8 tonnes per Ha earned. This was a 1 tonne per hectare more, than with the minerally fertilised haper. And with 50% less mineral nitrogen. With wheat and barley one reaches the same profit level, how with minerally fertilised grain. Also maize in Austria brought 7.5 - 19% higher yield. Please, excuse my bad one in English.

Cheers
Agrarservic Heine

TwinN

Fri, 23/07/2010 - 10:55
By Chris (not verified)

Hi

I am seeing TwinN being used in a vareiety of countries to great effect. Not only is it helping reduce carbon emissions but since it's microbial there's no leaching either so it's safe to apply in NVZ's.

Nitrogen use efficiency

Wed, 09/06/2010 - 21:38
By Tim Chamen (not verified)

Also key to maximising nitrogen use efficiency is improving soil structure and this is mostly about managing soil compaction. Extensive studies have shown that uncontrolled compaction by field machinery can reduce nitrogen use efficiency by around 15% , evidenced in a similar increase in crop yield if compaction is avoided. In addition, there is mounting evidence that the poor soil aeration associated with compaction leads to greater emissions of nitrous oxide and methane, both extremely pernicious greenhouse gases. Nitrous oxide is a direct loss of nitrogen to the atmosphere that was destined for the crop, so not good on the pocket either! Soil biology is also improved if compaction is avoided and should enhance any additional measure, such as Twin N.
So how do you avoid soil compaction I hear you ask! Well, you don' t avoid it exactly, you just confine to the least possible area. Presently our production systems track around 80% of our fields every year. With a technique known as Controlled Traffic Farming, you can turn this statistic on its head and leave 80% of the field "traffic free". Find out more by visiting our website at www.controlledtrafficfarming.com
Hope this is of interest
Tim

Nitrogen

Wed, 09/06/2010 - 11:52
By Adam Lockyear (not verified)

FWAGs view is that the very first step any farmer needs to take is to make sure that any Nitrogen applied is available and can be taken up by the plant from whatever source is being used organic or inorganic.

Check soil structure - if the plant can't develop a good root system and the soil is't able to breath due to poor structure then it doesn't matter how much nitrogen you add.

Check soil nutrients - the availability of nitrogen is only one limiting factor to plant productivity make sure that the nutrients in your soil are balanced and the pH is correct.

More time needs to be devoted to these first steps especially in grassland systems.

Twin N

Sat, 29/05/2010 - 10:00
By Chris wadman (not verified)

Morning Mike
You have succeeded in tempting me to comment on my first blog ever!
I suppose the first thought of an old cynic like me is does it work, then how much does it cost and if those two answers settle favourably, then how consistent is the performance of this product.
I must say I was shocked to learn that it takes so much energy to produce bagged N and I suspect that the future success of mankind is in getting the energy balance more even.
Chris

TwinN

Wed, 21/07/2010 - 08:24
By John Scott (not verified)

Hi, yes Mike is right, it does work, I was looking at a field last week where the Famer had used twinN along with 150kg of N on his wheat, at the side of this was his normal farm rate of 220kgs and no TwinN. I couldnt see any difference in plant populations or ear size between the two treatments. I am looking forward to the harvest results, a 70kg saving of nitrate has got to be good. Regards John

TwinN

Tue, 08/06/2010 - 21:15
By Mike Sandercock (not verified)

Chris Hello,
Very valid questions. Yes it does work~ we have may replicated trials to back this up accross the world & here in England from ADAS, Nickersons, Warwickshire College & several others. I can pass you copies of their findings if you wish.
Spookily the cost is favourable. It works out at roughly the price of 1 x 50kg bag of AN per acre & provides the equvalent Nitrogen as 1 1/2 to 2 bags (apologies for the old currency thinking!) This, I'm sure, is vital as if growers can save money then it's good business. If it's also good for the environment then this adds great appeal.
We have found that the mode of application & the level of chlorination in the water has the most effects on it's reliabillity ~ get these right & we're away.
Thank you four your response & I hope this becomes useful for more people.
Kind regards
Mike

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.